![imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k](https://mresell.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/imac-27-late-2013-4-300x300.jpg)
- #Imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k full size#
- #Imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k upgrade#
- #Imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k portable#
At the time, spending $300 for a 512 GB SSD didn’t make sense because I needed more storage, and $700 for the 1 TB SSD upgrade was too dear for my budget. While I had configured it with 32 GB of memory, I opted for a 1 TB Fusion Drive, Apple’s combination of a fast, low-capacity SSD with a slow 5400 rpm, high-capacity hard drive. When I bought the iMac, I unfortunately cheaped out in one important regard. But it took me until two weeks ago to truly unleash its power. When I purchased a quad-core 21.5-inch iMac with Retina display in 2017 and added a secondary 4K display, I felt that I had spent the right amount of money relative to my needs. With a few delightful exceptions that involve printing history and letterpress, I spend most of my day looking at a screen, tapping away on a keyboard, and manipulating a mouse.
![imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k](https://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images1000x1000/apple_mk452ll_a_21_5_imac_with_retina_1190358.jpg)
#Imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k portable#
Preview selections, portable power for a MacBook ProĪn External SSD Gave My iMac a New Lease on Life #1618: M2 MacBook Air available to order, Lockdown Mode, Live Text vs.#1619: Stage Manager first impressions, Live Text in Preview redux, SMS 2FA failure fix, moving large folders with ChronoSync.#1620: OS updates, AssistiveTouch for iOS shortcut palette, Photos album sharing bug.#1621: Apple Q3 2022 financials, Slack's new free plan restrictions, which OS features do you use?.#1622: OS feature survey results, Continuity Camera webcam preview, OWC miniStack STX.I've tried 3 different DP cables, all with the same result. I set AppleFontSmoothing to 0 to turn off subpixel antialiasing. I guess that's the subpixel antialiasing not working so well with MiniDP. Can you see the hues around the edges of text? I think that's what's messing with my eyes.
#Imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k full size#
Open the pictures in full size using two different tabs, and flick between them, you should be able to see the difference.
![imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k](https://applesencia.com/files/2013/10/imac-dise%C3%B1o.jpg)
It may not be easy to see the difference when paying attention to the pixels, but the subtle difference makes a huge difference in readability during normal use.
![imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k imac 27 late 2013 external monitor 4k](https://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2014/09/applethunderboltdisplay_sep14-800x492.jpg)
Unfortunately it only runs at 30Hz on HDMI, so that's not a solution. I've found out that when connected using HDMI instead of MiniDP, the rendering is improved. I'm using a Mini-DP to Mini-DP cable, running at full resolution, and 60Hz frequency.Ĭan anyone shed some light please? Can anything be done about it? More Info It simply appears more pixelated, everywhere. OS X does allow changing the level of font smoothing by overwriting the AppleFontSmoothing defaults, but no amount of fiddling with the values can resolve the issue, and besides, the issue isn't just about text anyway (e.g. However, as someone who doesn't understand much about the internals of displays, I'm struggling to understand why the quality and crispness of the image on my 40" Philips monitor cannot match that of the iMac's, despite the higher PPI.Īnd by quality of image, I'm not limiting this to text-rendering alone. I understand these two displays are built by different manufactures and use different technologies. Being a 39.56" UHD screen, it runs at a native resolution of 3840 x 2160, resulting in a PPI around 111.Ĭompare that to the standard 27" Apple Display/iMac, which at a native resolution of 2560 x 1440, has a PPI of 109. The monitor in question is the Philips Brilliance 4K Display BDM4065UC/00. I'm looking to understand exactly why a monitor with higher number of pixels per inch (albeit slightly so), than the standard 27" iMac, cannot produce image that is at least just as sharp as images on the iMac.